Companies that are winning—even really big, old ones—never have a retention problem. Everyone wants to stay, and when someone does leave, it's really easy to get someone great to take her place. Companies that have a retention problem usually have a winning problem.
Key highlight
All the raises, perks, and HR-sponsored 'company values' drafting sessions in the world won't help you retain great people if you're not winning—not even the $6,000 heated Japanese toilets in all the restrooms, the $30,000 Olympic lap pool out back, and the free $4 bottles of organic orange juice in all the snack rooms. The only way a company in that situation can retain great people is to start winning again.
Highlights (8)
Focus on retaining the magnets—the great architects and managers (or their equivalents) who attract and hire other great people. If you keep a critical mass of them, retaining everyone else becomes much easier. Lose them and you lose everyone.
Clean house simultaneously: fire the VIPs ('vesting in peace'), the 'summertime soldiers' who only joined after you were already successful, and the mediocre performers. This immediately lifts the morale of your remaining stars and frees up comp budget to reallocate to them.
Nuke all matrices, dual reporting structures, and shared services. Push QA, docs, build, etc. into the product divisions and tolerate the overlap—your best people will move so much faster that it's worth the duplicated headcount.
Re-recruit the best people who already left. Many have discovered the grass wasn't greener at the mediocre startup or other big company they jumped to. Give them fat packages tied to the new mission and bring them back.
When someone wants to leave for a startup to 'build something,' make them a deal: stay two more years, take a bigger job with real responsibility, and you'll personally introduce them to the right startup or VC when they're ready. Most big-company people are bad at picking startups anyway, and they'll be far more valuable in two years.
Don't create an 'innovation group.' It tells the rest of the organization both that they're not supposed to innovate and that they're the B team—a one-two punch that wrecks the culture. Same logic kills programs like Google's Founders' Awards: big spot bonuses to a few create backlash from everyone who didn't get one.
A company in crisis often has a severe narrative problem alongside its business problems. Stories don't change by themselves—change the story. When all else fails, do a 'shake and bake': a big transformative deal that at minimum reinjects energy, though you can easily destroy the company doing it.
Discover the greatest founder wisdom on the internet.
Subscribe to get one timeless startup resource in your inbox every week day.
Keep reading
VideoMarc Andreessen on the 5 personality traits of an innovator
Marc Andreessen
Mar 2026 · 1 min read
The five personality traits that separate true innovators from everyone else.
EssayGuide to Career Planning, Part 3: Where to go and why
Marc Andreessen
Oct 2007 · 9 min read
How to pick the industry, company, and role where your opportunities will compound.
EssayGuide to Career Planning, Part 2: Skills and education
Marc Andreessen
Oct 2007 · 17 min read
Which skills actually compound in a career — and what formal education is and isn't good for.
EssayGuide to Career Planning, Part 1: Opportunity
Marc Andreessen
Sep 2007 · 11 min read
Why planning a career is pointless — and why seizing opportunities beats following a plan.