Startup Wisdom

Search archive

Search for a command to run...

Key highlight

Maybe the smartness and the craziness were not as separate as we think. Newton's alchemy and theology weren't the eccentric detours of a genius — they were two of three roughly equal bets a rational risk-taker made, and we only call the third one 'judgment' because it happened to pay off.

Highlights (4)

Biographies of famous scientists edit out their mistakes, so we underestimate the degree of risk they were willing to take. The choices that worked become conventional wisdom and stop looking like bets at all.

Newton made three bets — physics, alchemy, and theology. One of them worked. But they were all risky.

In Newton's day, physics, alchemy, and theology seemed roughly equally promising. No one yet knew what the payoff for inventing physics would be — if they had, more people would have been working on it.

Alchemy and theology were, in Newton's time, what Marc Andreessen would call 'huge, if true.' Hindsight makes them look like obvious wastes of time; at the time they were live bets on enormous payoffs.

Discover the greatest founder wisdom on the internet.

Subscribe to get one timeless startup resource in your inbox every week day.

Keep reading